ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Identifying druggable gene-related biomarkers in intervertebral disc degeneration through transcriptome sequencing and mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is a major contributor to low back pain, yet its molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Identifying potential druggable genes (PDGs) associated with IDD could facilitate early diagnosis and targeted therapy. This study aimed to explore the diagnostic and mechanistic significance of PDGs in IDD. Methods and Results: Three GEO datasets were merged as a training set, with another blood-based dataset as testing. PDGs were obtained from the literature and intersected with differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Functional enrichment and immune infiltration analyses were performed. A Lasso regression model was developed for diagnosis, and Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis inferred causality. Cellular experiments validated key gene expression. Fourteen differentially expressed PDGs were identified, primarily involved in immune responses and neutrophil activity. A five-gene diagnostic model (BPI, CD160, CTSG, CYP27A1, KIF11) was constructed and demonstrated high accuracy. MR analysis confirmed a causal relationship between BPI and CTSG with IDD. GSEA revealed that BPI was negatively associated with oxidative phosphorylation, while CTSG was linked to the G2M checkpoint. Cellular experiments confirmed BPI and CTSG upregulation in TNF-α-induced NPCs. Conclusion: This study constructed a diagnostic model and identified BPI and CTSG as potential biomarkers for IDD, providing new insights into IDD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.