ArticleMaterials today. Bio2026
Synergistic 3D-bioprinted scaffold with multi-level adaptability for vascularized bone regeneration via osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nano-Based 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D-printed dictamni-calcium silicate scaffolds modulate the osteoimmune microenvironment and enhance macrophage-derived exosomal miR-21 signaling in vascularized bone regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Hydroxyapatite-based bone repair biomaterials based on clinical heterogeneity: modification strategies, performance regulation, and personalized repair pathways.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D bioprinting enables the fabrication of biomimetic, cell-laden and pro-osteogenic constructs with high precision for bone regeneration. The ability of integrating favorable mechanical strength and multi-material interactive bioactivity in engineered constructs for efficient bone defect repair is still a challenge. Herein, we employed a dual-nozzle synergistic 3D bioprinting technology to fabricate a biocomposite scaffold that integrated interactive soft hydrogel filaments and hard polycaprolactone (PCL)-based filaments by mimicking weave patterns. The multi-material scaffold design aimed at providing features of suitable microstructure and long-term mechanical support, enhanced vascularized bone regeneration for bone repair. Chitosan/hyaluronic acid functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles bearing osteogenic protein on the surface and angiogenic drug in the pores were embedded into cell-supportive hydrogel bioink for promoting osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling. Meanwhile, MgO nanoparticles were incorporated into structure-supportive PCL matrix for improving mechanical strength and compensating angiogenic/osteogenic activities by sustained release of Mg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.