Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661092›Full record

ReviewFuture science OA2026

Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Sri Saran Manivasagam, Amar Kassim, Jay D Raman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future science OA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sri Saran ManivasagamDepartment of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Amar KassimPennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Jay D RamanDepartment of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNon-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for over 75% of bladder cancer cases worldwide and is associated with high recurrence rates and significant surveillance costs. Advances in diagnostic modalities, risk stratification, and bladder-preserving therapies have transformed management strategies. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review synthesizes evidence from 70 key publications identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2005-2025). Topics include clinical presentation, diagnostic innovations such as enhanced cystoscopy and urinary biomarkers, contemporary risk stratification models, and evolving treatment paradigms including intravesical therapy, immunotherapy, and gene therapy. NMIBC management is shifting toward precision-based, multimodal approaches that integrate molecular biomarkers, immunotherapy, and novel drug delivery systems. While early-phase trials show promise, large-scale studies and real-world data are essential to validate these strategies. Personalized surveillance using circulating and urinary tumor DNA may reduce procedural burden and improve outcomes, marking a paradigm shift toward adaptive, patient-centered care.

Indexed as

biomarkersdiagnosisguidelinesimmunotherapyintravesical therapyNon-muscle invasive bladder cancerrisk stratificationsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41661092
PMCPMC12893692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.