ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Relationship status and the neurobehavioral symptoms of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relationship status influences mental and physical health in the general population and may mitigate radiological abnormalities in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, there are limited data about whether one's relationship status impacts the neurobehavioral symptoms of MS, such as depression, anxiety, fatigue, or self-reported cognitive concerns. This study's objective was to explore the influence of relationship status on the neurobehavioral sequelae of MS. At a Canadian neuropsychiatry clinic, 1393 people with MS (pwMS) consecutively completed psychometric testing with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale sub-scales for anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) for self-reported cognitive concerns. Participants were categorized by the presence or absence of an intimate relationship. Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were undertaken to examine whether relationship status influenced HADS-A, HADS-D, MFIS, or PDQ scores, adjusting for age, sex, education, Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, disease subtype, illness duration, and disease-modifying therapy use. Mean age was 43.37 years, 73.33% were female, median EDSS was 2.00, and 55.86% were married. Controlling for covariates, the presence of a relationship was associated with decreased HADS-D scores (p = .006). Relationship status did not independently influence HADS-A, MFIS, or PDQ scores. Overall, being in a relationship is linked to decreased depressive symptoms in pwMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41661341What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.