ArticleAMB Express2026
Optimization of a fatty acid methyl ester protocol for quantification of odd- and even-chain fatty acids in yeast.
Article in AMB Express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) analysis is widely applied in fields ranging from food and biofuel research to fatty acid profiling in microorganisms. Given the challenges associated with accurately quantifying both even- and odd-chain fatty acids, this study presents a tailored FAME protocol employing a fully deuterated internal standard (dIS) for their simultaneous analysis. Two oleaginous yeast species, Yarrowia lipolytica and Blastobotrys adeninivorans, were chosen for their distinct fatty acid profiles and served as models to evaluate protocol sensitivity and extraction efficiency. Here, we compared two simultaneous extraction and transesterification methods, a microwave-assisted and a shaker-assisted protocol, and found that the microwave-assisted approach not only successfully recovered the dIS but also extracted yeast fatty acids more efficiently than the shaker-assisted method. Incorporating a bead-beating pre-extraction step further improved lipid recovery and reduced variability. Our results suggest that the non-methylated dIS, when added as a free fatty acid, methylates more slowly than yeast-derived fatty acids that are mainly found as triacylglycerols. This can complicate normalization and supports the use of a pre-methylated dIS. While FAME yields varied depending on the extraction method and applied normalization strategies, the FAME profiles remained consistent across protocols, highlighting strong reproducibility in qualitative analyses. The optimized FAME protocol provides a precise and reliable analysis of fatty acids in diverse oleaginous yeast species. Our results underscore the need for species-specific optimization of FAME protocols and warn against relying on a deuterated single fatty acid standard without protocol adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.