ReviewDiscover nano2026
Nanotherapy for acute pancreatitis: a systematic review of experimental strategies and mechanisms of action.
Review in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Macrophages in Acute Pancreatitis: From Inflammatory Initiators to Repair Coordinators and Targeted Therapeutics.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute pancreatitis (AP) is a severe inflammatory disease that has limited pharmacological options. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems have shown promise in preclinical models, but a comprehensive synthesis of their mechanisms and therapeutic profiles in AP is lacking.
objectiveTo systematically review preclinical nanotechnology-based therapeutic strategies for acute pancreatitis and to classify nanocarriers according to their dominant mechanisms of action.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies using on in vivo AP models treated with nanomaterials or nanoformulations. Eligible studies have reported therapeutic outcomes compared with non-nano or untreated controls.
resultsFifty-six in vivo studies met our inclusion criteria. Most investigated polymeric (PLGA, PEG-PLGA, and silk fibroin) and lipid-based nanocarriers have fewer inorganic/metal-based and biological or biogenic nanostructures. Across heterogeneous AP models, nanoformulations consistently reduced pancreatic edema, necrosis, and inflammatory infiltrates; lowered serum amylase/lipase and pro-inflammatory cytokines; attenuated remote organ injury, particularly acute lung injury, relative to controls; and improved survival in severe AP. Mechanistically, nanotherapeutics chiefly exert anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, often accompanied by modulation of calcium overload, mitochondrial dysfunction, cell death, and microcirculatory disturbances.
conclusionsPreclinical evidence indicates that nanotechnology-based interventions can ameliorate pancreatic and systemic injury in experimental AP through multitarget modulation of key pathogenic pathways. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of models and nanoplatforms, limited safety data, and substantial risk of bias preclude firm conclusions about comparative efficacy or clinical applicability. More rigorous and standardized preclinical studies, along with carefully designed translational research, are needed to identify nanotherapeutic strategies suitable for future clinical testing in AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.