Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661783›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2024

Patient experiences of treatment-resistant depression (TRD): A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

Alexandra Cernat, Manisha Pahwa, Dima Hadid, Katrina Shen, Julia Abelson, Zainab Samaan, Amanda Ramdyal, Meredith Vanstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra CernatHealth Policy PhD Program, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6007-7825
Manisha PahwaHealth Policy PhD Program, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Dima HadidHealth Policy PhD Program, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Katrina ShenDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Julia AbelsonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Zainab SamaanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Amanda RamdyalDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-6259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) occurs when depressive symptoms persist after a patient has tried at least two antidepressants at an appropriate dose for an adequate length of time, as judged by their clinician. Understanding what it is like to live with and seek care for TRD can inform treatment planning and contribute to health technology assessments for depression-related therapies. Our objective was to systematically review this evidence through an investigation of qualitative literature about the experiences of people who have TRD. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science Core Collection. Publications eligible for inclusion were English-language primary empirical qualitative studies or the qualitative component of mixed methods studies examining adults' experiences with TRD or with specific treatment options for TRD. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, as well as critically appraised included studies using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) instrument. This review was guided by integrative meta-synthesis. Data analysis consisted of a staged coding process similar to grounded theory. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO prior to the search (record ID: CRD42022356813). Sixteen studies were included from screening 18,568 results. Two studies focused on the overall experience of TRD and 14 explored experiences of specific treatments such as ketamine. Patients described the depressive symptoms they experienced, a sense of futility and desperation to find an effective treatment, and their experiences with new, sometimes experimental, therapies including deriving benefits beyond the clinical. Overall, few studies have examined the patient experience of TRD, reflecting the clinical complexity of this patient population. As most literature coalesced around experiences of specific treatments, greater examination of the overall experience of TRD is needed to inform clinical practice, and administrative and funding policy decisions for interventions that may be effective for this patient population. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022356813.

Identifiers

PMID41661783
PMCPMC12798643

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.