Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661863›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2024

Estimating the effects of Basic Income schemes on mental and physical health among adults aged 18 and above in the UK: A microsimulation study.

Howard Robert Reed, Elliott Aidan Johnson, Graham Stark, Daniel Nettle, Kate E Pickett, Matthew Thomas Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Good Society (and how we make it).Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cumulative Social Determinants of Health Are Associated With Anxiety: A Weighted Quantile Sum Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Howard Robert ReedDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Elliott Aidan JohnsonDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Graham StarkDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Daniel NettleDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-2599
Kate E PickettUniversity of York, York, United Kingdom.
Matthew Thomas JohnsonDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-7050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic Income is a largely unconditional, regular payment to all permanent residents to support basic needs. It has been proposed as an upstream health intervention by increasing income size and security. Modelling has quantified prospective effects on UK young people's mental health. This paper extends this analysis to mental and physical health among adults aged 18+ using data from the 2021/22 Family Resources Survey and 12 waves (2009/11-2020/22) of Understanding Society to model the effects of three prospective schemes: 1) (£ per week) £50 per under-18, £75 per 18-64, £205 per 65+; 2) £75, £185, £205; 3) £100, £295, £295. We estimated effects on cases of depressive disorders (SF-12 MCS ≤45.6) and physical health problems (SF-12 PCS ≤50), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and willingness-to-pay value gained, as well as direct NHS, personal social services and patients' associated costs savings regarding depressive disorders. Between 124,000 (95% CI: 86,000-150,000) and 1.005m (95% CI: 845,000-1.402m) cases of depressive disorders and 118,000 (70,000-156,000) to 1.042m (881,000-1.612m) cases of physical health problems could be prevented or postponed each year depending on the scheme. 129,000 (86,000-172,000) to 655,000 (440,000-870,000) QALYs could be gained, valued at £3.87bn (£2.58bn-£5.16bn) to £19.65bn (£13.21bn-£26.10bn). Estimated 2023 NHS and personal social services cost savings are between £126m (£88m-£154m) and £1.026bn (£872m-£1.432bn) assuming 50% of depressive disorders cases are diagnosed and treated at baseline. Estimating savings based on physical health problems is more difficult, but may reflect far greater related NHS and social care spend. Although non-income change impacts are not microsimulated, these findings indicate that Basic Income could provide substantial population health benefits, social return on investment and health and social care system savings. This gives policymakers and researchers an evidence base on which to base trial and policy design. Basic Income; Social determinants; Prevention; Upstream interventions; Microsimulation modelling.

Identifiers

PMID41661863
PMCPMC12798306

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.