ArticlePLOS mental health2024
Mapping the organisational network of support for people experiencing homelessness in rural coastal areas of North East England: Results from a mixed-methods multi-sector social network analysis.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning from a multi-agency trauma-informed care training initiative supporting people experiencing homelessness in rural and coastal areas: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of physical and mental health, housing, social care, police, voluntary, and community services, alongside trauma-informed care, is vital for supporting people experiencing homelessness. This study examined organisational networks in rural and coastal regions of North East England, mapping and analysing these networks to identify provision, gaps, and opportunities for integration, and trauma-informed care. A mixed-methods study was conducted in rural and coastal areas of North East England, using purposive and snowball sampling for recruitment. Surveys collected data on inter-organisational collaborations, referrals, and service provision. Semi-structured interviews explored service provision for people experiencing homelessness, gaps in service provision, and trauma-informed care practices. Social network analysis was used to map and characterise organisational networks, measuring network density, distribution of degree and betweenness centrality. Thematic analysis was applied to interview data. Twenty-six participants from 24 services supporting homeless individuals were recruited. An additional 36 services were nominated as network participants, forming a network of 60 services. The network encompassed various service providers, with the most prevalent being Advice and Support services (n = 26), followed by Housing (n = 13) and Local Authority (n = 11). However, the network exhibited limited connections and collaborations (density = 0.029, average ties per service = 10.03). Three key themes emerged from the interviews: need for trauma-informed training and awareness, the impact of trauma on homelessness, and need for coordination and support. There is a need for strengthened connections and collaborations between services in rural and coastal areas to address the complex needs of people experiencing homelessness. Key players emerged across service types, with advice and support, emergency care, and criminal justice services as important intermediaries. Moreover, the implementation of trauma-informed approaches is limited. The findings highlight the importance of multi-agency collaboration in addressing the health, including mental health, needs of people experiencing homelessness.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.