ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Experiences and coping strategies among patients with Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) in Ghana: A phenomenological study.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It's more than connecting tubes": a qualitative inquiry into nurses' emotional labor in dialysis units.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Challenges and Lived Realities of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Ghana: A Qualitative Inquiry.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, chronic renal failure (CRF) presents significant physical, emotional, and psychosocial challenges for patients. The burden of CRF is further compounded by limited access to specialized healthcare, financial constraints, and factors that shape patient experiences and coping strategies. Therefore, this study sought to explore the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with chronic renal failure in Ghana. A phenomenological qualitative design was employed, using purposive. Data collection involved in-depth interviews, and the transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis with the aid of ATLAS.ti. The analysis was presented in a thematic network to visualize key themes and subthemes. The study did not adopt a pre-existing theoretical framework but was guided by participants' narratives. Thematic analysis revealed two major themes: (1) Lived experiences of chronic renal failure, with subthemes of emotional distress, physical challenges, and financial hardship; and (2) Coping strategies, including emotional coping, avoidance, religious faith, and acceptance coping. The lived experiences of patients with chronic renal failure revealed profound emotional, physical, and financial challenges. Patients initially described their diagnosis as shocking and distressing, with many experiencing depression, anxiety, or suicidal thoughts. Financial strain and limited access to dialysis worsened their burden. Nonetheless, various coping strategies helped patients adapt and regain a sense of control. Acceptance, emotional and avoidance coping emerged as a powerful coping mechanism, where patients acknowledged their illness, adapted their lifestyle, and found resilience in living one day at a time. Living with chronic renal failure significantly impacts patients emotional, physical, and financial well-being, with many experiencing depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts. Despite these challenges, patients employ coping strategies such as emotional expression, avoidance, reliance on religious faith, and acceptance. The study emphasizes the need for the Ghana Health Service to prioritize individualized interventions, and post-diagnosis counselling, and to enhance coping effectiveness and improve patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.