ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Bleeding rectal polyp as an atypical presentation of intestinal schistosomiasis: A case report from Egypt.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchistosomiasis remains an important public health challenge in Egypt despite decades of control programs. Intestinal involvement is relatively common but usually presents with diffuse mucosal disease, ulcerations, or multiple polyps. A solitary bleeding rectal polyp as the sole manifestation is exceedingly rare and can be mistaken for inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal neoplasia. This report aims to highlight this diagnostic challenge within the Egyptian context. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old Egyptian male from a rural area presented with a 3-month history of intermittent lower abdominal pain and rectal bleeding. Physical examination was unremarkable except for mild lower abdominal tenderness and blood on digital rectal exam. Laboratory tests, including inflammatory markers, were normal; notably, stool microscopy was repeatedly negative for schistosome ova, despite the presence of RBCs and WBCs. Colonoscopy identified a solitary, pedunculated, and ulcerated rectal polyp (1.5 × 3.0 cm) at 20 cm from the anal verge, which was completely resected. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis by demonstrating viable Schistosoma mansoni ova within eosinophilic granulomas and, critically, an adult worm residing in the submucosal vasculature, confirming active infection.The patient achieved full clinical recovery after praziquantel therapy, and this case underscores the importance of integrating parasitological, endoscopic, and histopathological perspectives when managing atypical colorectal lesions in endemic regions.
conclusionThis case is a striking example of intestinal schistosomiasis masquerading as a sporadic colorectal neoplasm. In endemic regions like Egypt, schistosomiasis must be considered in the differential diagnosis of solitary rectal polyps, even with negative stool examinations. The definitive diagnosis hinges on histopathological analysis, which is indispensable for guiding correct management and avoiding unnecessary interventions. This report reinforces the ongoing, evolving challenge of schistosomiasis in Egypt post-control programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.