Observational studyPLoS medicine2026
The impact of the Lancet Commission definition of obesity on its prevalence and implications on long-term cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes in East Asians: Observational study of two community-based cohorts.
Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- BMI-Based and Clinical-Obesity Trajectories and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective UK Biobank Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Operational Approach to the Lancet 2025 Obesity Framework in Mexican Adults: Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics.Nutrients · 2026Article
- The Complex Relationship Between Clinical Obesity and Heart Failure: From New Definitions to Clinical Challenges.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- The lancet commission obesity categories, excess adiposity, and BMI discordance in urban Chinese adults: a cross-sectional survey in Beijing.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Age- and sex-specific associations of underweight and excess adiposity with incident CKD in type 2 diabetes: nationwide Korean cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Lancet Commission proposed an update in January 2025 on the definition of obesity which requires at least one anthropometric measurement in addition to body mass index (BMI) to confirm excess adiposity. Also, the presence of obesity-related organ dysfunction is used to differentiate between clinical and pre-clinical obesity. We evaluated how applying the Lancet Commission proposed definition of obesity, which required an additional anthropometric measurement to verify excess adiposity, would affect its prevalence, and its implications on the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health. METHODS AND
findingsWe used two representative Chinese community-based cohorts and compared five categories of participants with (i) clinical obesity, (ii) preclinical obesity, (iii) BMI ≥25 kg/m2 without confirmed excess adiposity, (iv) overweight and (v) normal/underweight in the cross-sectional cohort for cardiometabolic risk profiles and in the longitudinal cohort for long-term cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes. In the cross-sectional cohort, the prevalence of obesity was 44.5% in men and 26.7% in women defined by the Asian BMI cutoff of ≥25.0 kg/m2, and decreased to 33.8% and 24.1%, respectively, using the Lancet Commission definition (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 and elevated waist circumference). Applying the Lancet Commission definition would reclassify a portion of individuals who are initially classified as having obesity based on BMI criteria alone (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) but with normal waist circumference to be non-obese (category iii). The individuals falling into category iii had an adverse cardiometabolic health profile which was intermediate among the five categories regarding insulin resistance and visceral adiposity (falling in between categories ii and iv). In the longitudinal cohort with a median follow-up of over 20 years, people with clinical obesity had the poorest cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes including all-cause mortality, whereas those reclassified as non-obese had an intermediate risk of adverse cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes among the five categories. The main limitation of the study was that all participants were Chinese and findings might not apply to other ethnic groups.
conclusionAdoption of the Lancet Commission definition would classify a small proportion of individuals with BMI of ≥25.0 kg/m2 as non-obese. People with clinical obesity identified by the revised criteria had the highest risks of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes including all-cause mortality, whereas individuals reclassified as non-obese had intermediate risks of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes between those in pre-clinical obesity and overweight categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.