Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662368›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2026

The impact of the Lancet Commission definition of obesity on its prevalence and implications on long-term cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes in East Asians: Observational study of two community-based cohorts.

David T W Lui, Carol H Y Fong, Xincheng Zou, Aimin Xu, Hung Fat Tse, Jean Woo, Tai Hing Lam, Yu Cho Woo, Bernard M Y Cheung, Edward Janus and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David T W LuiDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9813-1126
Carol H Y FongDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Xincheng ZouDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5757-5482
Aimin XuDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Hung Fat TseDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9578-7808
Jean WooDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7593-3081
Tai Hing LamThe School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Yu Cho WooDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Bernard M Y CheungDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Edward JanusWestern Health Chronic Disease Alliance and Department of Medicine, Western Health-Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-4515
Karen S L LamDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5757-541X
Kathryn C B TanDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9037-0416
Chi Ho LeeDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7569-409X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Lancet Commission proposed an update in January 2025 on the definition of obesity which requires at least one anthropometric measurement in addition to body mass index (BMI) to confirm excess adiposity. Also, the presence of obesity-related organ dysfunction is used to differentiate between clinical and pre-clinical obesity. We evaluated how applying the Lancet Commission proposed definition of obesity, which required an additional anthropometric measurement to verify excess adiposity, would affect its prevalence, and its implications on the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health. METHODS AND

findingsWe used two representative Chinese community-based cohorts and compared five categories of participants with (i) clinical obesity, (ii) preclinical obesity, (iii) BMI ≥25 kg/m2 without confirmed excess adiposity, (iv) overweight and (v) normal/underweight in the cross-sectional cohort for cardiometabolic risk profiles and in the longitudinal cohort for long-term cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes. In the cross-sectional cohort, the prevalence of obesity was 44.5% in men and 26.7% in women defined by the Asian BMI cutoff of ≥25.0 kg/m2, and decreased to 33.8% and 24.1%, respectively, using the Lancet Commission definition (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 and elevated waist circumference). Applying the Lancet Commission definition would reclassify a portion of individuals who are initially classified as having obesity based on BMI criteria alone (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) but with normal waist circumference to be non-obese (category iii). The individuals falling into category iii had an adverse cardiometabolic health profile which was intermediate among the five categories regarding insulin resistance and visceral adiposity (falling in between categories ii and iv). In the longitudinal cohort with a median follow-up of over 20 years, people with clinical obesity had the poorest cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes including all-cause mortality, whereas those reclassified as non-obese had an intermediate risk of adverse cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes among the five categories. The main limitation of the study was that all participants were Chinese and findings might not apply to other ethnic groups.

conclusionAdoption of the Lancet Commission definition would classify a small proportion of individuals with BMI of ≥25.0 kg/m2 as non-obese. People with clinical obesity identified by the revised criteria had the highest risks of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes including all-cause mortality, whereas individuals reclassified as non-obese had intermediate risks of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic outcomes between those in pre-clinical obesity and overweight categories.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesKidney DiseasesObesityAdiposityAdultBody Mass IndexChinaCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41662368
PMCPMC12904575

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.