ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Spatially distinct FRL and Ena dependent actin networks coordinate nuclear positioning in Drosophila nurse cells.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Position of the nucleus is dynamically controlled to ensure a variety of cellular functions in a broad range of organisms form yeast to human. Nuclear positioning in Drosophila nurse cells is crucial during dumping when cells transfer their entire cytoplasmic content into the oocyte. An important prerequisite of effective dumping is the formation of an array of actin cables which holds the nucleus in a central position, thereby allowing transmission of the cytoplasmic cargo. Here we report the identification of FRL, a formin type of actin assembly factor, as a novel determinant of cytoplasmic actin bundle formation. We found that FRL and the formerly described Ena protein display a differential requirement. Comparison of the frl and ena loss of function situations revealed that FRL is mainly required for creation of the cytoplasmic actin subpopulation at stage 10B, while Ena mostly promotes formation of a ring canal attached actin array, already present at stage 7 and persists till dumping. Upon the concurrent absence of FRL and Ena the nuclear positioning actin cables are completely missing, strongly suggesting that nuclear positioning in the nurse cells requires the coordinated action of two spatially distinct actin networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.