ArticleNeurology2026
Expert Consensus Approach to Developing Inpatient Common Data Elements for Neonatal Encephalopathy Research.
Article in Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesNeonatal encephalopathy (NE)-including hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)-is associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. While data registries provide hypothesis-generating data, aid in quality improvement, and track management/outcomes over time, we recently demonstrated that only 4 of 1,281 (0.3%) variables were collected by all 22 international NE/HIE registries: birth weight, gestational age, and 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores. In response, our team set out to develop a set of common inpatient data elements to enable future harmonization of NE/HIE registry data.
methodsUsing a modified Delphi method, a panel of 14 international NE experts voted to separate the 1,281 variables from our previous study into "core elements," "supplemental elements," or those that "do not need to be collected." Based on the anonymous survey results, we created draft lists of core and supplemental common data elements (CDEs). These lists were further revised through group consensus meetings and external feedback from global registry leaders and attendants at 2 international conferences.
resultsThe final data forms include 164 core elements and 225 supplemental elements stratified into 11 domains: demographics; pregnancy, labor, and delivery; delivery room; transport; acid-base; therapeutic hypothermia; neuromonitoring and seizures; neuroimaging; laboratory values (other than acid-base); hospital course; and discharge. DISCUSSION: The CDEs are the first of several important steps to further standardize research and reporting of NE/HIE investigations to perform more efficient and powerful clinical research in the field moving forward. Future studies need to establish a clinical and research definition of HIE and develop CDEs for collecting long-term, family-centered follow-up data postdischarge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.