ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Personalized Diabetes Treatment Support Using Large Language Models Fine-Tuned on Electronic Health Records: Development and Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Adaptation of Language Models for Clinical Decision-Making in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Correction: Personalized Diabetes Treatment Support Using Large Language Models Fine-Tuned on Electronic Health Records: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in prediabetes care: applications in screening, risk prediction, and lifestyle intervention.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective diabetes management requires individualized treatment strategies tailored to patients' clinical characteristics. With recent advances in artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to enhance clinical decision support, particularly in generating personalized recommendations. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an LLM-based outpatient treatment support system for diabetes and examine its potential value in routine clinical decision-making. Methods: Three compact LLMs (Llama 3.1-8B, Qwen3-8B, and GLM4-9B) were fine-tuned on deidentified outpatient electronic health records using a parameter-efficient low-rank adaptation approach. The optimized models were embedded into a prototype hospital information system via a retrieval-augmented generation framework to generate individualized treatment recommendations, laboratory test suggestions, and medication prompts based on demographic and clinical data. Results: Among the models evaluated, the fine-tuned GLM4-9B demonstrated the strongest performance, producing clinically reasonable treatment plans and appropriate laboratory test recommendations and medication suggestions. It achieved a mean Bilingual Evaluation Understudy for 4-grams score of 67.93 (SD 2.74) and mean scores of 44.30 (SD 3.91) for Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation for overlap of unigrams, 27.34 (SD 1.85) for Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation for overlap of bigrams, and 37.67 (SD 2.88) for Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation for Longest Common Subsequence. Conclusions: The fine-tuned GLM4-9B shows strong potential as a clinical decision support tool for personalized diabetes care. It can provide reference recommendations that may improve clinician efficiency and support decision quality. Future work should focus on enhancing medication guidance, expanding data sources, and improving adaptability in cases involving complex comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.