ReviewTranslational psychiatry2026
Clinical and biological markers of electroconvulsive therapy effectiveness: a narrative review.
Review in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of ECT-anesthetics on reorientation time.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Microbiome-Informed Precision Electroconvulsive Therapy: Oral-Gut-Immune Signatures and Seizure Biology as Candidate Predictors of Response-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The postictal systems window hypothesis of electroconvulsive therapy in major depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for several particularly severe or pharmacotherapy-resistant psychiatric disorders, and a growing number of studies have investigated factors influencing the effectiveness of ECT. The objective of this article is to review the current evidence on clinical and biological markers potentially related to response to ECT and to outline perspectives for future research. In depressive disorders, the presence of clinical characteristics such as higher age, psychotic and psychomotor symptoms, and the absence of comorbid personality disorders are associated with a particularly good response to ECT. However, these clinical factors alone explain only a part of the variance of treatment outcome. Biomarkers at the genetic/epigenetic, immune inflammatory, and brain imaging levels are now providing promising and, in part, converging findings on both the mechanism of action and predictors of response to ECT. Taken together, these findings suggest a close relationship between specific clinical symptoms, the immune inflammatory, and neuroplastic mechanisms of ECT. While genetic studies consistently indicate a higher genetic risk load in patients referred for ECT, findings regarding the predictive value of polygenic risk scores and also epigenetic markers for ECT response remain inconsistent. In the future, combining clinical features and biomarkers could help define subgroups of psychiatric disorders with distinct pathophysiology and reliably predict treatment outcomes at the individual patient level. For now, it may be assumed that different and possibly age-dependent prototypical forms of depressive disorders exist, which are characterized by specific clinical (psychotic and psychomotor symptoms) and inflammatory markers (higher levels of IL-6 and CRP) and show a differential response to treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.