ArticleNature communications2026
A 7T fMRI dataset of synthetic images for out-of-distribution modeling of vision.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Triple-N dataset: large-scale fMRI-guided dense recordings of nonhuman primate neural responses to natural scenes.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- In silico discovery of representational relationships across visual cortex.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale visual neural datasets such as the Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD) are enabling models of the brain with performances beyond what was possible just a decade ago. However, because the stimuli of these datasets typically live within a common naturalistic visual distribution, they make it challenging to implement out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization tests crucial for the development of robust brain models. Here, we address this by releasing NSD-synthetic, a dataset of 7T fMRI responses from the same eight NSD participants for 284 synthetic images. We show that NSD-synthetic's fMRI responses reliably encode stimulus-related information and are OOD with respect to NSD; that OOD generalization tests on NSD-synthetic reveal differences between brain models that are not detected in-distribution; and that the degree of OOD (quantified as the test data distance from the training data) is predictive of the magnitude of model failures. Together, NSD-synthetic enables OOD generalization tests that facilitate the development of more robust models of visual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.