ArticleScientific reports2026
Health-FedNet: secure federated learning for chronic disease prediction on MIMIC-III with differential privacy and homomorphic encryption.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI without representation is just inequity at scale: on the exportation of unrepresentative artificial intelligence models to the Global South.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing trend of utilizing artificial intelligence in healthcare has put it under significant consideration as a means of enhancing early diagnosis and clinical decision-making, though the centralized storage of patient information persists in posing significant privacy, regulatory, and interoperability issues. This paper presents a new federated learning framework named Health-FedNet, which is a privacy-protective and secure predictive model of chronic diseases and is designed to allow training a model using multiple institutions without the transfer of raw clinical information. This framework integrates three main elements, including calibrated differential privacy, the Paillier homomorphic encryption, and secure aggregation, which guarantee that the updates of the models are kept secure during the training pipeline. A node-weighting program is integrated so as to stabilize convergence in the situation where the data distribution is heterogeneous by giving priority to high-quality institutional contributions. Health-FedNet was tested on the MIMIC-III clinical database to predict diabetes and hypertension in a simulated environment of multiple hospitals under realistic conditions. The results of the experiment obtained after five independent runs prove that the model has reached an accuracy of 92%, and AUC-ROC is equal to 0.94, with the confidence interval showing the relevance of these findings at 95 percent. Paired t-tests (p < 0.01) have statistically validated that Health-FedNet is 12% more predictive than centralized and baseline federated (meaning less communication overhead produces a 41.6% decrease in communication overhead). Privacy tests show that the suggested approach will lower the membership inference risk by 20 to 5%. The framework is compliant with HIPAA and GDPR and proves to be robust in the presence of noisy or imbalanced clinical data. Health-FedNet gives a viable basis for safe federated healthcare analytics and has high potential to be implemented in distributed hospital information systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.