ArticleScientific reports2026
Accurate forecasting of photovoltaic optimal points and efficiency using advanced hybrid machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of photovoltaic performance is essential for improving solar energy management, optimizing operational schedules, and supporting investment decisions. This study proposes a structured data-driven forecasting framework that integrates standalone learners with a hybrid boosting–aggregation strategy to predict two critical photovoltaic performance indicators: the optimal peak operating time (NOPT) and the power conversion efficiency (PCE). The methodology involves systematic data preprocessing, feature normalization, model training using both single and hybrid learners, and performance validation under identical experimental conditions. Multiple data-driven algorithms were examined using comprehensive statistical metrics, including R², RMSE, and U95. Among all models, the hybrid XGBA framework demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving R2 values of 0.9954 for NOPT and 0.9970 for PCE, and consistently low errors across all evaluation criteria. Model robustness and generalization were further assessed through uncertainty-based evaluation metrics. Sensitivity analyses highlight key influential parameters such as Emin Emax, and Ap, revealing their substantial contributions to model outputs. The proposed hybrid model provides a robust and highly accurate predictive tool that can reduce operational uncertainties, enhance energy yield, and support data-driven decision-making for photovoltaic plant operators and energy sector stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.