ArticleScientific reports2026
Interdependency between oxytocin and dopamine in trust-based learning in mice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxytocin (OT) is a neuropeptide implicated in complex social behaviors such as trust and attachment, yet the neural mechanisms underlying its effects remain unclear. OT is thought to modulate behavior by enhancing salience of social cues and attenuating prediction error (PE) processing, the discrepancy between expected and actual outcomes that drives learning. Since both salience coding and PE processing involve dopamine (DA), we investigated OT and DA interdependency in social safety learning using the social transmission of food preference (STFP) paradigm. In STFP, mice overcome neophobia towards novel food after a conspecific demonstrator signals its safety. We interpreted STFP acquisition as a functional parallel to human trust-based learning and found that OT enhanced demonstrated food preference in a trust acquisition condition, but only when DA signaling was intact. In a trust violation condition, the expectation of food safety was violated by pairing demonstrated food with lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced aversion. Updating was blocked after OT administration and non-significantly reduced after DA depletion, resulting in a continued preference for demonstrated food. However, this effect was absent when OT was administered under DA depletion. These findings reveal a functional interaction between the OT and DA systems in social safety learning, which may have important implications for OT's potential in treating disorders involving DA dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.