ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of deep learning models for segmentation of hippocampus volumes from MRI images in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hippocampus is a crucial brain structure associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Precise segmentation is crucial for studying AD progression using deep learning. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning models in segmenting the left and right hippocampus in MRI images. We hypothesized that deep learning-based approaches would enable precise and accurate segmentation of the left and right hippocampus. We propose U-Net, You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLO-v8), and DeepLab-v3 models using the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. This study used 300 subjects, comprising 100 subjects (AD), 100 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 100 subjects with normal control (NC), resulting in a total of 7859 image slices. The results showed that the U-Net model exhibited the best Intersection over Union (IoU), which served as a key performance indicator among the three classes: AD (0.639), MCI (0.801), and NC (0.751). In contrast, YOLO-v8 demonstrated lower IoU performance for AD (0.342), MCI (0.465), and NC (0.550), which are considered inappropriate models to segment the left and right hippocampus. We obtained the left hippocampus volume of AD (1557.5 mm³), MCI (1863.3 mm3), and NC (2089.2 mm3). The right hippocampus volumes of AD (1593.4 mm³), MCI (1918.7 mm3), and NC (2280.2 mm3). The U-Net model exhibited the best performance. We expect deep learning-based methods to assist in clinical decisions by providing accurate hippocampus segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.