ReviewInflammopharmacology2026
Cell-free therapeutics for non-healing wounds: role of MSC-derived exosomes in macrophage polarization, angiogenesis, and fibroblast-mediated ECM remodeling-bridging preclinical insights to clinical translation.
Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Neuroimmune regulation of post-traumatic bone regeneration: focus on inflammatory switching and functional recovery.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Molecular pathways and immune microenvironment regulation in stem cell therapy for thin endometrium: a comprehensive narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-healing wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers, burns, and pressure injuries, represent a persistent clinical challenge, affecting an estimated 2-5% of the global population and accounting for annual healthcare costs exceeding USD 25 billion. Their failure to heal is driven by unresolved inflammation, inadequate vascularization, and progressive disorganization of extracellular matrix (ECM) architecture, which collectively disrupt the coordinated cascade of tissue regeneration. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes have emerged as a potent cell-free therapeutic approach capable of addressing these pathological barriers through multi-level biological modulation of immune, vascular, and stromal compartments. Preclinical studies demonstrate that topical or injectable administration of MSC-derived exosomes accelerates wound closure by 25-60% within 10-14 days compared to controls. Immunomodulatory effects include promoting macrophage polarization from M1 to M2 phenotypes, with reported increases in M2/M1 ratios of 1.5-3.2-fold, mediated by exosomal miRNAs (e.g., miR-223, miR-181c) and proteins that suppress NF-κB signaling. Angiogenesis is markedly enhanced, with microvascular density rising by 30-70%, driven by the transfer of VEGF, miR-126, and miR-21 to endothelial cells, thereby boosting migration and tube formation. Fibroblast activity is similarly upregulated, resulting in 1.4-2.0-fold increases in collagen deposition and restoration of the MMP/TIMP balance, leading to improved tensile strength and ECM integrity. Integration of biomaterial-assisted delivery platforms, including thermosensitive hydrogels, collagen scaffolds, and microneedle arrays, extends exosome retention and functional bioavailability at the wound site by 2-5 times compared to free vesicles. While early clinical trials report safety and feasibility, challenges in large-scale GMP manufacturing, batch-to-batch consistency, and regulatory harmonization. Overcoming these translational barriers through advances in bioengineering, genetic modification, and smart delivery systems may enable the evolution of MSC-derived exosomes into standardized, next-generation therapeutics for chronic, non-healing wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41663771What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.