SynthesisJournal of behavioral medicine2026
Psychological determinants of medication adherence in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacological treatment is essential for achieving blood pressure control in patients with hypertension; however, medication adherence remains suboptimal. Understanding its determinants is essential, but the role of psychological factors in medication adherence among hypertensive patients is still unclear. This study aimed to identify and synthesize evidence on modifiable psychological determinants associated with medication adherence in hypertensive patients. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycARTICLES, up to September 1, 2025. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals. A total of 5,455 records were initially retrieved, of which 112 studies met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-one studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The findings identified depressive symptoms (OR = 0.86, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.95, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
41663870What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.