ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Comfort or necessity: obstetricians' perspectives on the drivers, consequences, and recommendations for reducing caesarean section rates in Turkey.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaesarean section (CS) is life-saving when clinically indicated; however, Turkey’s CS share ranks near the top globally, indicating potential overuse.
methodsThis qualitative study, using a descriptive phenomenological design, explored obstetricians’ perspectives on the drivers of rising CS rates, the consequences of non-indicated CS, and feasible strategies to reduce overuse. Between March and June 2025, 40 obstetricians were recruited via purposive, maximum-variation sampling from public, training & research (university), and private hospitals across multiple regions of Turkey. Semi-structured, web-based interviews (Zoom/Google Meet) were audio-recorded with consent and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed in MAXQDA 10 using inductive, conventional qualitative content analysis, with codes derived directly from the data, organised into categories, and developed into themes and subthemes.
resultsAnalysis identified three overarching themes comprising 13 subthemes. Theme 1—Drivers of rising CS: medico-legal anxiety and defensive practice; convenience, scheduling and workflow pressures; declining confidence with complex vaginal births; technology-centred surveillance; expectations for planned/painless birth shaped by families and social media; and financial/payment signals in mixed public–private provision. Theme 2—Consequences and the “comfort versus necessity” paradox: maternal and neonatal risks (including infection, thrombo-embolism, adhesions and early-elective CS–related respiratory morbidity), ethical distress among clinicians, erosion of vaginal-birth skills, and increased system costs with potential equity impacts. Theme 3—Participant-reported strategies to reduce unnecessary CS: coordinated actions spanning malpractice protections/safe harbours; payment redesign (e.g. bundled/global models that value labour support) with Robson audit-and-feedback; scaling nursing-midwife-led continuity of care; 24/7 labour analgesia; strengthened vaginal birth after caesarean pathways; and antenatal education that involves partners alongside balanced public communication.
conclusionsObstetricians located CS overuse chiefly within sociocultural, legal, organisational and incentive structures, rather than clinical necessity. A multi-component, system-level response—aligning medico-legal frameworks, financing that rewards labour support, nursing-midwifery workforce models, round-the-clock analgesia, and patient-facing education—appears essential to normalise safe, respectful vaginal birth and curb unnecessary CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.