ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Missing data, missed risks: complications and documentation gaps of central venous access devices in pediatric oncology.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral venous access devices (CVADs) are essential in pediatric oncology but frequently associated with infections, thromboses, and dysfunction. Although structured surveillance may reduce complications, implementation is limited by fragmented documentation across clinical systems.
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study combining a two-stage interdisciplinary electronic Delphi process with retrospective cohort analysis. Pediatric oncology patients diagnosed between 2020 and 2021 who received a CVAD at our university hospital were included. Data were manually extracted from three hospital information systems. Only the first CVAD per patient was analyzed (n = 112).
resultsOf 219 diagnosed patients, 112 met inclusion criteria, accounting for 126 CVADs. The eDelphi panel identified 30 core surveillance parameters, 23 retrievable from routine records. Complications occurred in 23.2%, most commonly infections leading to premature removal.
conclusionsStandardized electronic CVAD documentation could enhance surveillance, improve patient safety, and reduce manual data collection efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.