ArticleBMC public health2026
How dietary habits and behaviors safeguard daily living activities among the elderly - novel insights from a decade-long longitudinal study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid global population aging highlights the urgent need for targeted health recommendations to enhance the quality of life (QoL) for seniors and alleviate financial burdens. This study identifies key determinants of Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL) among the Chinese elderly, focusing on dietary habits, daily behaviors, health status, and access to medical care.
methodsThe data utilized in this study were derived from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Participants were selected from individuals initially followed in 2008 who remained alive through 2018. BADL were evaluated during the follow-up assessments conducted in the years 2008, 2011, 2014, and 2018. Participants were classified into two groups according to the variations observed in their BADL scores over a ten-year period: the ‘Immutable Type (IT)’ and the ‘Deteriorated Type (DT).’ Physical function was assessed using the Katz index, which includes six fundamental activities: bathing, dressing, toileting, indoor transferring, continence of defecation, and eating. Dietary intake was evaluated based on the frequency of consumption of various food groups and the specific types of foods ingested. The research employed univariate analysis to identify potential factors influencing physical functioning among the elderly. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was utilized to balance for age and gender, followed by sensitivity analyses using four different models to ensure the robustness of the findings.
resultsA total of 2,350 participants were included in the analysis: comprising 1,666 individuals in the IT group and 684 in the DT group. The median age of participants in the stable group was 72 years, ranging from 62 to 103 years (n = 1666), while the median age of those in the deteriorating group was 78.0 years, ranging from 63 to 104 years (n = 684).The study found that a diet with rice as the staple food, engagement in housework, living alone, having lower systolic blood pressure, and the absence of a history of cardiovascular disease or stroke were significantly associated with maintaining stable BADL in the elderly. These factors were consistently identified across all sensitivity analysis models.
conclusionsThe results suggest that specific dietary habits and lifestyle factors are linked to better physical functioning in older adults. The study’s findings can inform health guidance and interventions for the elderly, potentially contributing to increased healthy life years and reducing the financial burden on society. The use of PSM and multiple sensitivity analyses strengthens the reliability of the study’s conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.