ArticleNursing open2026
Associations Between the Nurse Practice Environment and Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcomes: Empirical Research Quantitative.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to investigate associations between the nurse practice environment and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in Hong Kong.
designThis was a 4-wave repeated cross-sectional study.
methodsThe sample comprised 71 adult general medical, surgical and orthopaedic wards recruited from four public hospitals. Data on nurses' practice environment and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes were collected quarterly from each hospital over a one-year period from January 2016 to December 2018. The number of participating nurses per survey wave ranged from 604 to 865. Measures comprised the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index and four nurse-sensitive patient outcomes identified from the National Quality Forum-endorsed nursing-sensitive care measure set. The associations between each outcome and the practice environment were examined using multiple regression analysis.
resultsNurse practice environments were rated favourably. The 'Nursing foundations for quality of care' subscale received the highest score (59.6) while the 'Staffing and resource adequacy' subscale received the lowest score (36.7). Though no significant associations were found between the overall practice environment and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes, the subscale of 'Staffing and resource adequacy' was significantly associated with the incidence of inpatient falls and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that staffing is a core nurse workplace concern which impacts the outcomes of inpatient falls and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. However, the overall nurse practice environment was not significantly associated with any patient outcomes, and further studies are needed to corroborate these results. Additional mediating factors such as nurse resilience, which may potentially affect patient outcomes, should also be explored. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients or the general public were not involved in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the data in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.