ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Assessing Patient Priorities and Satisfaction Regarding Aesthetic Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast reconstruction aims to enhance patient quality of life by achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes. This study examines aesthetic preferences and satisfaction among patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction (ABR).
methodsA 35-item survey was distributed to adult patients who underwent ABR from 2017 to 2023 at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Patients completed three separate ranking questions in which they were asked to prioritize individual components of the breast (ranked 1-8), abdominal donor site (1-7), and nipple-areolar complex (1-6), with lower values indicating greater importance. Satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Non-responders were contacted at 1 and 4 weeks, followed by phone outreach.
resultsAmong 301 eligible patients, 156 responded (52.1%). Breast symmetry was the highest priority (mean = 1.9, SD = 1.2), followed by shape/contour (2.6, 1.4) and position (3.1, 1.6), while NAC (5.3, 1.8) and donor site aesthetics (5.7, 1.6) ranked lowest. Satisfaction was higher for breast aesthetics (66%) than for donor site aesthetics (58%). Black patients prioritized shape/contour (64%) over symmetry (10%), while White patients prioritized symmetry (51%) over shape (26%) (p < 0.05). Black patients also reported greater dissatisfaction with breast (p = 0.006) and donor site (p = 0.029) aesthetics.
conclusionThis study shows that patients value different facets of their reconstruction differently. Furthermore, racial differences in aesthetic preferences and satisfaction following ABR emerged, which providers need to be mindful of. Addressing patient expectations through improved communication during the preoperative consultation may enhance aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.