Evidence mapPaperPMID 41665656Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2026

[Immunometabolic mechanisms in atypical depression].

Marco Kramer, Georg Juckel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marco KramerKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Alexandrinenstr. 1, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland. marco.kramer@rub.de.
Georg JuckelKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Alexandrinenstr. 1, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtypical depression (AD) is a subtype of unipolar depression characterized by mood reactivity, hypersomnia, hyperphagia and interpersonal sensitivity. The concept of immunometabolic depression (IMD) describes a subgroup with additional metabolic and inflammatory abnormalities, such as obesity, insulin resistance and elevated C‑reactive protein (CRP) levels.

objectiveTo summarize current evidence on AD, its overlap with immunometabolic mechanisms and therapeutic implications. MATERIAL AND

methodsNarrative review based on a PubMed search using the terms "atypical depression" and "immunometabolic depression" (IMD), supplemented by relevant review articles.

resultsAtypical depressive syndromes are associated with increased systemic inflammation and metabolic dysregulation. There is evidence suggesting specific efficacy of bupropion and monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, although overall evidence remains limited. In patients with immunometabolic abnormalities (e.g., elevated C-reactive protein), anti-inflammatory agents (e.g., infliximab) and metabolically active medications (e.g., oral antidiabetic drugs) are discussed as potential treatment options; however, statins have not shown consistent antidepressant effects to date. Physical activity and dietary interventions appear additionally beneficial. DISCUSSION: The concept of IMD could enable stratified treatment approaches in the future. At present the evidence is inconclusive and no specifically approved treatment is available. Moreover, frequent fluctuation between atypical and melancholic syndromes complicates clinical differentiation.

Indexed as

Atypical depressionImmunometabolic depressionInflammationInsulin resistancePersonalized psychiatry

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.