Evidence mapPaperPMID 41665673Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Psychotherapists' role in requests for assisted suicide-an open question].

Pola Hahlweg

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pola HahlwegInstitut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. p.hahlweg@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' requests for assisted suicide involve a complex, longitudinal, and iterative process. For healthcare professionals, this process potentially involves various communicative and evaluative tasks, such as providing information about alternative courses of action, assessing psychological distress and, if necessary, diagnosing mental disorders and examining free decision-making capacity. Due to pending legislation in Germany, there are currently no specific obligations for psychotherapists regarding assisted suicide. This narrative review first specifies general tasks in requests for assisted suicide and then applies these to psychotherapists. A distinction is made between legal and professional obligations ("must"/"cannot"), professional competencies ("can"), and normative recommendations derived from these ("should").Psychotherapists' professional code of conduct and competencies show that they are qualified to participate in requests for assisted suicide. At the same time, possible consequences for the psychotherapeutic role resulting from participation in a request that aims to end one's life should be thoroughly considered and appropriate communication strategies developed. In addition, a clear distinction must be made between supportive and evaluative activities. The voluntary nature of psychotherapists' involvement must be preserved, in particular the right to conscientious objection. Overall, the potential benefits of psychotherapists' involvement in requests for assisted suicide appear to clearly outweigh the possible disadvantages.

Indexed as

PsychotherapistsSuicide, AssistedGermanyHumansAid in dyingClinical PsychologyCompetenciesNarrative reviewWishes for hastened death

Identifiers

PMID41665673
PMCPMC12957010

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.