ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
Development and validation of a diagnostic model for obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent, underdiagnosed disorder linked to serious health risks. This study developed a diagnostic model for OSA.
methodsClinical data were analyzed from 3,038 adults who underwent polysomnography at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University between 2015 and 2024. Sixteen candidate predictors were initially considered and a 70:30 split was used to divide participants into training and validation groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to predict OSA risk. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plots, Brier score, and decision curve analysis.
resultsThe model included four predictors of OSA (age, longest apnea time, lowest oxygen saturation, and oxygen desaturation index). The model demonstrated high accuracy with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.957 (95% CI: 0.945–0.969) in the training group and 0.945 (95% CI: 0.923–0.967) in the validation group. Brier scores were 0.071 and 0.081, with calibration plots showing excellent agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis confirmed clinical usefulness.
conclusionsThis study developed a highly accurate OSA diagnostic model to support clinical decision-making following polysomnography. Further validation in diverse populations is warranted to optimize its broad applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41665698What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.