ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Pomelo Peel and Soybean Meal Fermented by Three Probiotics or in Combination with Enzymes: A Comparative Study on growth, Immunity and Intestinal Health of Larimichthys crocea.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A 56-day feeding trial was conducted to compare the effects of pomelo peel and soybean meal (SM) fermented by microorganisms alone (BFPS) or in combination with enzymes (EBFPS) on growth performance, serum biochemistry, and intestinal health of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Large yellow croaker was randomly assigned to three groups (C, BFPS, and EBFPS) with four replicates per group and 160 fish per replicate. Results showed that BFPS and EBFPS significantly improved the growth performance and feed utilization. Fish fed BFPS- and EBFPS-containing diets exhibited reduced hepatosomatic index and serum activities of aspartate transaminase and alanine transferase, indicating superior liver health. Additionally, dietary BFPS and EBFPS increased serum lysozyme activity and immunoglobulin M concentration, while significant enhancement of serum alkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatase activities was only observed in the EBFPS group. Improvements of mid-intestinal morphology in BFPS and EBFPS groups were accompanied by reduced serum diamine oxidase activity and D-lactate content, as well as up-regulated expression of tight junction-related genes (zo-1, claudin-11, and occludin) in the mid-intestine. Interestingly, BFPS was associated with suppressed mid-intestinal inflammation and activated toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling, whereas EBFPS induced moderate inflammatory responses and down-regulated TLR signaling. The results of mid-intestinal microbiota showed that compared with C and BFPS groups, croakers fed the EBFPS diet exhibited a higher Shannon index and distinct community structures. Moreover, BFPS led to reducing mid-intestinal Brevinema but sharply increased Desulfobacterota, Lawsonia and Pseudomonas abundances, while EBFPS decreased Desulfobacterota, Lawsonia and Brevinema and increased unclassified_Bacteria. Overall, both BFPS and EBFPS positively modulated growth performance and mid-intestinal health, with distinct effects on immune responses and microbial community composition in large yellow croaker (L. crocea).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41665714What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.