ReviewCell and tissue banking2026
Global research trends in allogenic bone and bone banking in orthopaedics: a 25-year bibliometric analysis (2000-2025).
Review in Cell and tissue banking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogenic bone grafting and bone banking have become vital components of modern orthopaedic reconstruction, addressing bone loss following trauma, infection, tumor resection, and revision arthroplasty. Despite expanding clinical use, a comprehensive overview of global research productivity and collaboration in this domain has not been previously undertaken. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database (2000-2025) with defined search terms related to bone banking and allogenic bone grafting in orthopaedics. Data were analyzed using Scopus analytics and VOSviewer for publication trends, source impact, geographic distribution, authorship, funding patterns, and keyword co-occurrence networks. A total of 3497 documents were identified, showing steady publication growth. The majority were original research articles (79.2%). The United States led in publication output (37.7%), followed by China and Italy. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Spine were the most productive journals. Keyword mapping revealed core themes in revision arthroplasty, spinal fusion, limb reconstruction, and bone defect management. Global research on allogenic bone and bone banking demonstrates robust growth, interdisciplinary collaboration, and emerging regional contributions. Future efforts should emphasize standardization, outcome-based studies, and integration of biomaterials and regenerative technologies to enhance the safety and sustainability of bone banking worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41665735What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.