ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Machine learning, whole-transcriptome and integrative omics analysis reveals key regulatory networks governing human spermatogonial stem cells.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spermatogenesis—the process of sperm cell development—is highly dependent on precise and dynamic regulation of gene expression, much of which is controlled by Regulatory networks and hub genes governing spermatogonial stem cells (SSC) identity, including components involved in post-transcriptional regulations. During this complex process, a wide range of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and RNA processing enzymes coordinate the transcription, splicing, transport, storage, and translation of mRNAs required for germ cell development. Raw sequencing data were processed and normalized using standard bioinformatics pipelines (e.g., STAR, DESeq2). To identify key Regulatory networks and hub genes governing SSC identity, including components involved in post-transcriptional regulations, we applied integrative omics approaches by combining transcriptomic data with publicly available proteomic and interactome databases. Hub proteins were determined through weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and centrality scoring in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Machine learning models, including random forest and support vector machine (SVM), were trained to classify critical regulators based on expression features and metadata. Additionally, cell-cell communication was inferred using ligand-receptor interaction analysis via CellChat and NicheNet to explore the microenvironmental impact on RNA metabolic processes. All findings were validated across culture conditions and biological replicates to ensure robustness. Microarray analysis revealed 92 upregulated and 126 downregulated genes in SSCs versus htFib, with enrichment in motile cilium assembly, spermatid development, and gamete generation. DEGs were mainly extracellular matrix proteins, transporters, and adhesion molecules. PPI network and KEGG analyses identified key hub genes (e.g., MMP3, CAV1, TGFBR2) involved in cell cycle and meiosis pathways. Single-cell RNA-seq of human testicular cells identified 17 clusters, including germ and somatic cell types. Germ cell re-clustering defined SSC subpopulations marked by genes such as FAM74F1, SMCP, and ADAD1. GSEA indicated metabolic shifts, especially in oxidative phosphorylation, during SSC differentiation. Ligand–receptor analysis revealed active cell-cell signaling, particularly involving fibroblasts and macrophages. These findings enhance the understanding of human spermatogonia culture and gene expression, providing insights into SSC biology and potential applications in reproductive medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.