Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41665790›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2026

Development and validation of a prognosis model for low-grade gliomas based on metabolic gene risk scoring and immune microenvironment interaction.

Haobin Liu, Yuxiao Wu, Haoyu Sun, Xiao Han, Qian Liu, Yuening Zhang, Jinling Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haobin LiuSchool of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, 261000, China.
Yuxiao WuSchool of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, 261000, China.
Haoyu SunSchool of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, 261000, China.
Xiao HanSchool of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, 261000, China.
Qian LiuSchool of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, 261000, China.
Yuening ZhangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, 261000, China.
Jinling ZhangCancer Center, Linyi People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Linyi, 276000, China. jinlingzhang_931@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLow-grade gliomas(LGGs) show significant clinical and molecular heterogeneity, complicating progression prediction with conventional indicators. Metabolic reprogramming, a cancer hallmark, is linked to immune microenvironment remodeling, yet its role in LGG prognostic modeling remains underexplored. This study aims to develop a robust metabolism-related prognostic signature and elucidate its interaction with the immune microenvironment. MATERIALS AND

methodsMulti-omics data from 1322 LGG patients were obtained from public databases, including the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA), and others. Metabolism-related genes were identified using three strategies: (1) differential expression analysis; (2) univariate Cox regression; and (3) weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Overlapping genes were further refined using protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis and four algorithms. We systematically compared 101 machine learning algorithms and selected the Cox model with likelihood-based boosting (CoxBoost) and Ridge regression (Ridge) to construct the hub metabolism-related gene risk score (HMRG-RS).

resultA total of 7 hub metabolic genes were identified (TYMS, PLA2G5, GPX7, GLRX, CYP17A1, ALOX15B, ACACB). HMRG-RS demonstrated good prognostic predictive performance across multiple external validation cohorts, with an average concordance index (C-index) of 0.723 and 1/3/5-year area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.778/0.797/0.745. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited significantly shorter survival and an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by M2 macrophage enrichment and increased tumor mutational burden(TMB). Notably, the prognostic value of HMRG-RS and the metabolic subtypes it characterizes were significantly dependent on Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation status. Drug sensitivity analysis revealed differential responsiveness to specific chemotherapeutic/targeted agents (e.g., AZD6482, fluvastatin) across risk groups. Molecular docking further predicted multiple therapeutic compounds (e.g., prunellin, mometasone, isoliquiritigenin) with high affinity for pivotal metabolic genes. Single-cell analysis confirmed high expression of hub metabolism-related genes (HMRGs) in myeloid cells (particularly metabolically active protumor M2 macrophages), implicating them in lipid metabolism reprogramming and immune evasion.

conclusionThis study constructed and validated a metabolism-driven prognostic model. The model enables prognostic stratification of LGG patients and links high-risk scores to metabolic dysregulation and an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by M2 macrophage enrichment, based on multi-omics data. Mechanistic exploration indicates this association is particularly pronounced in myeloid cells, predominantly within metabolism-related M2 macrophage subpopulations. Furthermore, computational analysis suggests differences in drug sensitivity between risk groups and identifies potential therapeutic compounds, providing clues for future exploration of therapeutic strategies targeting metabolic-immune interactions.

Indexed as

Immune infiltrationsLow-grade gliomaMachine learningMetabolic reprogrammingSingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID41665790
PMCPMC12992800

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.