ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Natural variation in Arabidopsis uncouples leaf and flower development and reveals massive transcriptomic heterochrony.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant development is a sequence of precisely timed and spatially coordinated events that produce organs such as leaves and flowers. In Arabidopsis thaliana, for example, the development of leaves (called bracts in the inflorescence) halts once the first flower forms. Understanding how this transition is regulated is key for decoding how developmental programmes are coordinated during the floral transition. In this study, we investigated a natural phenotypic variation that uncouples bract repression from flower initiation. We discovered that the continued formation of bracts after the floral transition involves complex genetic interactions across at least four loci. Interestingly, none of these loci included known floral identity genes previously linked to bract repression, pointing to novel regulators in the coordination of bract and flower development. Using time-series transcriptomics and curve registration, we found that differences in gene expression levels when bracts persist are mainly driven by a massive desynchronization of gene dynamics. This affects a wide range of biological processes beyond those associated with leaf identity. These findings align with the 'inverse hourglass' model, which proposes that transcriptomic divergence at transitional stages contributes to morphological variation. Our results suggest that this model may also explain trait variability within species, highlighting how transcriptome dynamics shape phenotypic robustness during developmental transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.