ArticlePloS one2026
Measuring and analyzing the emotional engagement exhibited by chinese university students in ideological and political theory courses via the IPTCSSE.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the emotional responses and engagement levels of Chinese university students enrolled in Ideological and Political Theory Courses (IPTCs), with particular attention to how curriculum design influences students' attitudes and feelings. Using the IPTCSSE scale, a quantitative analysis was conducted to measure multiple dimensions of emotional engagement. A total of 3,992 valid questionnaires were collected. Based on the emotional engagement subscale, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified seven underlying factors: interest and belonging, classmates and peers, family and curriculum, emotions and feelings, sense of identification, teacher support and influence, and sense of achievement in courses. Descriptive statistics indicated that students generally evaluated all seven factors positively, and all factors were significantly and positively correlated. Among them, sense of achievement in courses received the highest score, while classmates and peers scored the lowest. Correlation and linear regression analyses further showed that each factor positively predicted emotional engagement in IPTCs. Interest and belonging emerged as the strongest predictor, whereas sense of achievement exerted the smallest predictive effect. Drawing on these findings, the study discusses how emotional engagement can be strategically emphasized to improve the pedagogical effectiveness of IPTCs. The results highlight the importance of fostering interest, belonging, supportive teacher-student relationships, and positive emotional experiences to enhance students' overall engagement with ideological and political education in China' s higher education context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.