Evidence mapPaperPMID 41666404Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Comprehensive review and assessment of machine learning approaches for host-pathogen protein-protein interaction prediction.

Fatima Noor, Muhammad Tahir Ul Qamar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatima NoorInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), The University of Lahore, Lahore 54792, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Tahir Ul QamarDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University Faisalabad (GCUF), Faisalabad 38000, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4832-4250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting host-pathogen protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is a cornerstone of modern infectious disease research, offering unparalleled insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying infection and immune evasion. Despite its transformative potential, the field faces persistent challenges, including limited experimental data, class imbalance, and the dynamic evolution of pathogens. The current study explores cutting-edge computational approaches that have redefined host-pathogen protein-protein interaction (HP-PPI) prediction. Notably, transfer learning has emerged as a game changer, enabling models to leverage knowledge from well-characterized systems to predict interactions in previously underexplored pathogens. Hybrid and ensemble models have proven highly effective, combining the strengths of diverse algorithms to capture the complexity of biological interactions. Explainable AI tools are now bridging the gap between computational predictions and biological interpretability, offering actionable insights into key interaction drivers. Additionally, the review discusses advanced data integration techniques, such as multi-omics fusion and graph-based learning, which explore new dimensions in HP-PPI research. This synthesis of challenges, solutions, and future perspectives highlights a paradigm shift in computational biology, in which scalable, interpretable, and biologically informed models pave the way for breakthroughs in therapeutic discovery, vaccine development, and precision medicine. Our review sets the stage for future advancements, emphasizing the potential of next-generation technologies to unravel the intricate dance between hosts and pathogens.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyHost-Pathogen InteractionsMachine LearningProtein Interaction MappingAlgorithmsHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Modelsdata integrationhost-pathogen interactionshybrid modelsinfectious disease modellingmachine learningtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41666404
PMCPMC12888821

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.