ArticleNature communications2026
Interpretable and generative deep learning models explicate phase separating intrinsically disordered motifs.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation-Enhanced Multienzyme Catalysis: Mechanisms and Applications.ChemSusChem · 2026Review
- Rethinking bioinformatics in liquid-liquid phase separation: data resources, predictive models, and an event-centric perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Interpretable and generative deep learning models explicate phase separating intrinsically disordered motifs.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins drive phase separation (PS) to form biomolecular condensates, which organize cellular matter. While IDRs are recognized as critical drivers of PS, the systematic identification of sequence motifs governing this phenomenon and their compositional determinants remain a key challenge. Here we develop PhaSeMotif, a deep learning framework for interpretable and precise predictions of essential phase-separating motifs within IDRs. We experimentally validate PhaSeMotif, demonstrating that mutations of predicted motifs significantly reduce or eliminate the PS capabilities of IDRs. The identified motifs possess diverse amino acid compositional features that are critical for determining PS propensities and condensate partitioning. Furthermore, PhaSeMotif integrates generative models to create validation-ready motifs that preserve these critical compositional features, empowering direct experimental verification and deeper mechanistic investigation of PS-driving IDR motifs. Overall, by combining motifs prediction, generation, and validation, PhaSeMotif provides an open-access toolkit to facilitate more efficient IDR motifs investigation and provides insights into the molecular determinants of PS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.