ArticleMedical education2026
'See me for me': An intersectional approach exploring sexual and gender minority medical students' experiences of role models.
Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigators of belonging.Medical education · 2026Article
- 'See me for me': An intersectional approach exploring sexual and gender minority medical students' experiences of role models.Medical education · 2026Article
- Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
phenomenonSexual and/or gender minority-identifying (SGM) medical students report lower levels of belonging and heightened discrimination in medical schools, especially among those who hold intersecting identities that are underrepresented in medicine (URM). Role modelling has been identified as a tool to combat this phenomenon. We used an intersectional approach to explore how interacting URM identities in relation to SGM identity mediate the experience of role models to influence feelings of belonging. APPROACH: We employed interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore nuanced and heterogeneous role modelling experiences. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 medical students from six medical schools in the United Kingdom.
findingsParticipants described how cisheteronormativity often led to loss of identity control, fragmentation and accompanying self-inauthenticity to protect their sense of belonging. Intersecting URM identities heightened feelings of otherness, and mediating multiple URM identities was cognitively taxing to many participants, even within traditionally inclusive spaces. Role models empowered participants to reclaim control over their narratives, engage in activism and enact disruptive visibility that challenged hierarchical norms. Participants valued role models who shared their intersecting identities, although many also emphasised that anyone who visibly respected SGM and URM identities could equally effectively foster belonging. Hierarchy and power imbalances prioritised by medicine limited the positive effects of role modelling and perpetuated identity fragmentation and inauthenticity. Accordingly, role models were consistently most visible and positive when in positions of influence. Overall, when positive and available, role modelling relationships provided practical pathways for students to integrate fractured identity threads into a more coherent, authentic self. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: This study is the first to apply an intersectional lens to role modelling experiences of SGM medical students with multiple URM identities in the UK. We offer some practical steps for medical schools to cultivate inclusive role modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.