ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Gemcitabine-docetaxel therapy in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory sarcoma: a single-center experience.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prognosis for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory sarcoma remains poor, and standard salvage therapies are lacking. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the gemcitabine and docetaxel (GEMDOX) combination in this patient population. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 36 pediatric patients treated with GEMDOX at our institution between 2015 and 2025. Patients received gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m Results: The median age was 13.5 years, with osteosarcoma being the most common diagnosis (58.3%). GEMDOX was administered predominantly as a third-line regimen (58.3%). The objective response rate (ORR) at the final assessment was 5.8%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 14.6%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.72 months (95% CI, 3.95-7.48) and 12.33 months (95% CI, 8.97-15.66), respectively. The most common Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (22.2%) and febrile neutropenia (19.4%), both of which were manageable with G-CSF support. No treatment-related mortality occurred. Conclusions: Although the objective response rate was modest in this heavily pretreated cohort, GEMDOX demonstrated a manageable safety profile. It represents a viable palliative option with a manageable toxicity profile for pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory sarcoma when curative options are limited. However, given its intensive nature, optimal efficacy may be better achieved when utilized earlier in the relapse setting rather than as a late-line rescue therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.