ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
The Effects of Using Prehospital Calcium Gluconate During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Calcium gluconate (CG) administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has not been recommended in routine clinical practice. This study examined the impact of prehospital CG administration on outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases. Methods: This retrospective cohort study collected data on adult patients aged >18 years who experienced non-traumatic OHCA and were transported by the emergency medical service (EMS) to the emergency department. Data on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at the scene, survival to hospital admission, and survival to hospital discharge were obtained from EMS reports and electronic medical records and compared between OHCA cases who received or didn't receive CG. Results: In total, 215 adult patients with non-traumatic OHCA were enrolled in this study. Among them, 107 received CG and 108 didn't receive. In particular, CG administration was associated with a lower rate of ROSC at the scene compared with cases without its administration (8.6% lower). The likelihood of ROSC at the scene was 0.75 times that of those who did not receive CG. CG administration was associated with a lower survival to hospital admission (16.48% lower). The likelihood of survival to hospital admission was 0.42 times that of patients who did not receive CG. In addition, survival to hospital discharge was 7.37% lower in patients who received CG, and the likelihood of survival to hospital discharge was 0.21 times that of those who did not receive CG. Conclusions: Prehospital CG administration by the EMS team did not improve ROSC in the scene, survival to hospital admission, or survival to hospital discharge. The findings highlight the need for selective use of calcium based on guideline-recommended indications rather than empirical administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.