ArticleClinical nutrition open science2026
Real-world implementation of a standardized ICU protocol for daytime-restricted enteral nutrition in critically ill adults: A retrospective quality improvement study.
Article in Clinical nutrition open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) delivery is often interrupted in the intensive care unit (ICU), and while continuous 24-hour feeding is standard practice, emerging evidence from circadian biology and pilot trials suggests that daytime-restricted EN may enhance nutritional adequacy and patient outcomes by aligning feeding with biological rhythms. Methods: This quality improvement study describes a novel, standardized daytime-restricted EN protocol in a community hospital ICU and retrospectively evaluate its real-world implementation. The protocol involved a stepwise transition in EN delivery, beginning with continuous trophic feeding (acute/initial phase), followed by daytime-restricted 12-hour cyclic feeding (anabolic recovery phase), and advancing to intermittent daytime-restricted feeding (chronic recovery phase). A convenience sample of 22 adult ICU patients (12 received continuous 24-hour EN; 10 with the daytime-restricted EN protocol) was analyzed. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records, including EN infusion rates, duration, and interruptions. Results: Patients in the daytime-restricted group received EN at higher infusion rates (median 87.5 vs. 40.0 mL/hr), over fewer hours per day (11.0 vs. 14.5 hours), experienced fewer interruptions (1.0 vs. 9.5 hours/day), and received a greater percentage of their prescribed nutritional volume (90.0% vs. 57.5%) compared to the continuous group (all Conclusion: This preliminary evaluation supports the feasibility of implementing a daytime-restricted EN protocol in an adult ICU and suggests potential advantages in delivery consistency and nutritional adequacy. To support broader implementation, larger prospective studies across broader ICU populations are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.