ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Adaptation and evaluation of the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in Restaurants for the Spanish Mediterranean context (NEMS-R-MED).
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in Restaurants (NEMS-R) is a validated tool originally developed in the United States for evaluating food environments in restaurants. This survey assesses the availability of healthy and unhealthy foods, the factors that facilitate or act as a barrier to healthy eating, food prices, and how foods are labeled and promoted. However, no such instrument exists for use in Spain, where the Mediterranean dietary context and restaurant culture differ significantly. The objective of this study was to adapt the NEMS-R instrument to the Spanish Mediterranean context (NEMS-R-MED) and evaluate its reliability and construct validity. Methods: Following a structured process of cultural adaptation-including translation, back-translation, expert review, and pilot testing-the NEMS-R-MED was applied independently by two raters in 57 restaurants across five neighborhoods in Alicante with varying socioeconomic statuses between November and December 2023. One of the raters evaluated the same restaurants again 30 days later. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were assessed using Cohen's kappa. Construct validity was tested using two techniques: (1) exploratory factor analysis and (2) known groups analysis, used to compare NEMS-R-MED scores between different types of restaurants and neighborhood socioeconomic levels. Results: Almost perfect inter-rater and intra-rater agreements were observed for most items (k > 80). Factor analysis revealed different constructs for each of the studied questions, which aligned with the theoretical constructs of the questionnaire. Significant differences in NEMS-R-MED scores were observed between sit-down restaurants, bar-cafeterias, and fast-food establishments, as well as across neighborhoods of different socioeconomic statuses, particularly in the "barriers to healthy eating" subscale. Conclusions: The adapted NEMS-R-MED instrument is a valid and reliable audit tool for assessing the food environment in restaurants within Spanish Mediterranean contexts. Additionally, NEMS-R-MED was able to discriminate effectively between restaurant types and neighborhoods with different socioeconomic statuses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.