ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Identifying key performance tests in differentiating starting and substitute women Rugby players: a discriminant function analysis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim/background: This study aims to identify the performance tests with the highest discriminatory power for distinguishing between starting and substitute female rugby players. Method: A total of 24 female rugby players, who regularly participated in official league competitions and engaged in structured training on a regular basis, voluntarily participated in this study. The players were divided into two groups: starting players (age: 25.83 ± 3.81 years, height: 165.17 ± 5.83 cm, body mass: 61.08 ± 5.00 kg) and substitute players (age: 26.08 ± 3.12 years, height: 163.75 ± 5.33 cm, body mass: 60.42 ± 4.52 kg). Wingate, sprints (30 m), squat jump test, visual reaction and VO Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between starting and substitute players in several performance variables, with starting players showing superior results in all performance tests, characterized by t-values ranging from 1.572 to 4.934, Conclusion: Maximum sprint speed and Wingate
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.