Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41669146›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025

Advances in cardiovascular supplementation: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical perspectives.

Xun Wu, Tanwei Fang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xun WuThe Second Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Tanwei Fang *Hunan Provincial Chest Hospital, Tuberculosis Control Institution of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of nutritional supplementation into cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and management represents a dynamic and often contentious field. Moving beyond traditional paradigms, recent research has sought to elucidate the precise molecular mechanisms, establish robust clinical efficacy through large-scale trials, and identify specific patient populations that may derive the greatest benefit. This review synthesizes the current evidence on key supplements-including omega-3 fatty acids, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), magnesium, and selenium-evaluating their roles from biochemical, translational, and clinical viewpoints. We explore the conditions under which certain supplements have transitioned from general wellness products to targeted therapeutic adjuvants, address the controversies surrounding their use, and discuss future directions for research and clinical application.

Indexed as

arrhythmiadyslipidemiaheart failuremeta-analysisnutritional statusprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID41669146
PMCPMC12883399

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.