Evidence mapPaperPMID 41669240Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Heart rate variability in cardiovascular disease diagnosis, prognosis and management.

Brian Xiangzhi Wang, Ella Brennand, Pierre Le Page, Andrew R J Mitchell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian Xiangzhi WangDepartment of Medicine, Jersey General Hospital, St. Helier, Jersey.
Ella BrennandDepartment of Medicine, Jersey General Hospital, St. Helier, Jersey.
Pierre Le PageDepartment of Medicine, Jersey General Hospital, St. Helier, Jersey.
Andrew R J MitchellDepartment of Medicine, Jersey General Hospital, St. Helier, Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV), the variation in intervals between consecutive heartbeats, reflects autonomic nervous system function and has been studied as a potential biomarker in cardiovascular disease (CVD). While reduced HRV has been linked to arrhythmias, heart failure, and ischaemic heart disease, findings across studies are mixed and its prognostic value remains debated. This review evaluates HRV's diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic roles in CVD. HRV can reveal autonomic dysfunction early, predict outcomes such as sudden cardiac death and recurrent myocardial infarction, and track recovery after cardiac events. It also shows promise in monitoring comorbid conditions like heart failure and depression that exacerbate cardiovascular risk. Advancements in wearable technology and machine learning are expanding HRV's potential. Wearable devices enable continuous, non-invasive HRV monitoring, while machine learning algorithms enhance the precision and predictive power of HRV analysis. These innovations may facilitate real-time data collection and tailored treatment plans, though their clinical utility requires validation in larger, prospective trials. Key challenges remain, including measurement variability, lack of standardisation, and limited incremental prognostic value over established risk factors. This review highlights HRV's emerging role in personalised cardiovascular care while acknowledging the substantial research needed before widespread clinical adoption.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseheart rate variabilitysudden cardiac deathvagus nerve stimulationwearable device

Identifiers

PMID41669240
PMCPMC12883741

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.