SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy of fasudil in COPD-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a serious complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that markedly worsens functional capacity and prognosis. Fasudil, a selective Rho-kinase inhibitor, has shown vasodilatory and vascular-protective effects; however, its therapeutic value in COPD-associated PAH has not been systematically quantified. Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of fasudil as an adjunctive therapy for COPD patients with PAH through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2024 for RCTs comparing fasudil plus conventional therapy with conventional therapy alone. Primary outcomes included overall treatment effectiveness and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Secondary outcomes were blood oxygen saturation (SaO₂), arterial oxygen tension (PaO₂), and 6-min walk distance (6MWT). Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity. Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 865 participants met the inclusion criteria. Fasudil significantly increased the overall effective rate (risk ratio = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.05-1.31, Conclusion: Fasudil confers consistent short-term benefits in COPD-related PAH, significantly lowering pulmonary pressures and enhancing oxygenation and exercise tolerance. While the included studies were of moderate methodological quality and limited to Chinese settings, the pooled evidence supports fasudil as a promising adjunct for managing COPD-associated PAH. Larger, multicenter RCTs with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety. The short follow-up (maximum 4 weeks) limits insights into sustained benefits or progression; long-term trials are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.