ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Optimizing S-detect classification accuracy for BI-RADS 4 breast nodules using multimodal ultrasound parameters.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing diagnostic precision for BI-RADS 4a breast nodules: A multimodal AI model integrating ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic signatures, and clinical profiles.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: S-detect is a deep learning (DL)-based ultrasound tool that automatically classifies breast nodules on grayscale images; however, its diagnostic specificity for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS 4) lesions is only 59.57%. Whether quantitative multimodal ultrasound (MUS) parameters can effectively enhance the performance of this tool remains unclear. This study therefore aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of S-detect in distinguishing benign from malignant breast nodules by integrating MUS parameters. Methods: Clinical and ultrasound data of 231 female patients diagnosed with BI-RADS type 4 breast nodules from June 2019 to March 2024 were retrospectively included, and S-detect classification results based on grayscale ultrasound images were obtained. MUS parameters were extracted, including Adler blood flow grading, vascular resistance index (RI), calcification, elasticity score (ES), elastic strain ratio (SR), and vascularity index (VI), among others, and meaningful parameters were analyzed to optimize the diagnosis results of benign and malignant breast nodules classified by S-detect. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), accuracy (ACC), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of S-detect classification before and after optimization. Results: Malignant nodules showed significantly higher SR [median 3.55 (2.39, 4.95) Conclusions: Combining S-detect with multi-modal ultrasound parameters significantly improves the differential diagnosis accuracy of the four categories of lesions of BI-RADS, and provides a reliable basis for clinical decision-making. However, this study has the limitation of a single-center retrospective design, and future multi-center prospective studies are needed for further verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.