Trial reportPeerJ2026
Remote ischemic preconditioning fails to enhance maximal accumulated oxygen deficit in well-trained college tennis players.
Trial report in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tennis, characterized by intermittent high-intensity bursts, demands both aerobic and anaerobic energy pathways for optimal performance. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has emerged as a potential method to enhance athletic outcomes. This study aimed to explore the impact of RIPC on anaerobic capacity, specifically the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD), in well-trained college tennis players. Methods: In a single-blinded, randomized, controlled crossover design, 16 participants (eight men and eight women; age: 20.9 ± 1.4 years; height: 1.73 ± 0.76 m; weight: 63.5 ± 8.2 kg; BMI: 21.2 ± 1.4 kg/m Results: The results indicated that RIPC had no discernible effect on time to exhaustion compared to baseline or placebo conditions ( Conclusion: In conclusion, this study provides evidence that remote ischemic preconditioning did not improve anaerobic capacity, as indicated by MAOD, among well-trained college tennis players. These findings emphasize the nuanced interplay of physiological factors in the context of RIPC and suggest that its impact on anaerobic capacity may be limited within this athletic cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.